Wall Street Storms Ripple In Explosive $500 Million Deal

bitcoinistОпубликовано 2025-12-09Обновлено 2025-12-09

Введение

Ripple secured a $500 million investment from major Wall Street firms, including Citadel Securities and Fortress Investment Group, lifting its valuation to approximately $40 billion. A key feature of the deal is the significant downside protection for investors, including a put option allowing them to sell shares back to Ripple after 3-4 years for a guaranteed 10% annualized return unless the company goes public. In return, Ripple can only force a buyback by paying about 25% annually. Investors also received liquidation preference. The deal is largely viewed as a concentrated bet on XRP, with an estimated 90% of Ripple's net asset value tied to the cryptocurrency. This structure is now become a new reference point for assessing crypto credit risk, pressuring Ripple to pursue an IPO or find new liquidity before the put windows open.

Ripple has become the most aggressively structured bet in blue-chip crypto after a group of major Wall Street firms wired about $500 million into the company in November, lifting its valuation to roughly $40 billion and making it one of the highest-valued private players in the sector. Bloomberg reported that Ripple’s share sale brought in some of the biggest names of Wall Street but only after investors secured a suite of downside protections.

Wall Street Goes All-In On Ripple

The investor line-up reads like a who’s who of modern market structure: Citadel Securities, Fortress Investment Group, Marshall Wace, Brevan Howard–linked vehicles, Galaxy Digital and Pantera Capital all participated, treating the round at least as much as a structured credit trade as a venture bet.

According to multiple accounts of the deal, several funds underwrote Ripple essentially as a concentrated exposure to XRP itself. Bloomberg’s reporting states that multiple investors concluded at least 90% of Ripple’s net asset value was tied to XRP, with the company controlling about $124 billion of the token at market prices in July.

That XRP cushion has already been tested. XRP is down roughly 40% from its mid-July peak and about 15–16% since late October, yet even after that drawdown, estimates in deal coverage still put the company’s XRP treasury in the tens of billions of dollars, with a large portion locked in escrow and released gradually over time.

The protection that Wall Street insisted on has become the defining feature of the deal. Investors secured the right to sell their shares back to Ripple after three or four years at a guaranteed 10% annualized return, unless the company has gone public by then.

Ripple, conversely, can force a buyback in those same windows only by delivering about 25% annually. On top of that, the funds negotiated a liquidation preference, giving them priority over legacy shareholders in a sale or insolvency.

The numbers involved are non-trivial. FinTech Weekly estimates that if the put option were exercised in full at the four-year mark, Ripple’s cash outlay would approach $700 million–$730 million, irrespective of operating performance or token prices at the time. Those obligations sit alongside an already heavy capital agenda: Ripple has agreed to buy prime-brokerage platform Hidden Road for roughly $1.3 billion and corporate-treasury specialist GTreasury for about $1 billion, while also confirming it has repurchased more than 25% of its outstanding shares.

Banks and trading desks are now treating the November round as a new reference point for crypto credit risk. FinTech Weekly reports that “those terms are now shaping how banks, funds, and trading desks assess Ripple’s balance sheet, exit risk, and future liquidity,” with the three- and four-year exit windows being modeled explicitly alongside XRP price scenarios and rate curves.

Ripple’s management maintains there is “no plan, no timeline” for an IPO, but the structure of the deal effectively date-stamps its private capital: either the company lists or finds new liquidity on favorable terms before the put windows open, or it must fund a secured, fixed-return exit for some of the most sophisticated players on Wall Street.

At press time, XRP traded at $2.0498.

XRP holds above key support, 1-week chart | Source: XRPUSDT on TradingView.com

Похожее

Bitcoin (BTC) Year-End Push to $100,000 Largely Depends on Fed Policy Pivot Outcome

Bitcoin's potential to reach $100,000 by year-end is heavily dependent on the outcome of the U.S. Federal Reserve's policy shift. The recent 4% drop in Bitcoin, bringing it to a low of $88,140, highlights the market's sensitivity to monetary policy and credit risk. A key factor is the Fed's transition away from quantitative tightening, which concluded on December 1. Over the past six months, this policy has removed $1.36 trillion in liquidity from the financial system. The market is now pricing in a high probability of rate cuts, with expectations for three reductions by September 2026. Lower interest rates and increased systemic liquidity reduce the appeal of fixed-income assets, as seen with money market funds hitting a record $8 trillion. Simultaneously, rising credit risk in the tech sector, exemplified by Oracle's soaring debt protection costs, is pushing investors toward scarce assets like Bitcoin. Oracle, with $105 billion in debt, relies heavily on AI-driven revenues, and the market's growing concern over the sustainability of such debt-fueled growth is creating structural unease. This combination of the Fed's policy pivot, diminishing fixed-income appeal, and tech sector credit risk sets the stage for capital rotation into Bitcoin. The path to $100,000 appears clearer as these macroeconomic and credit dynamics converge.

cointelegraph_中文5 мин. назад

Bitcoin (BTC) Year-End Push to $100,000 Largely Depends on Fed Policy Pivot Outcome

cointelegraph_中文5 мин. назад

The New Frontier of Privacy Coins: Technology, Prevention, and Regulatory Game

Privacy coins are at a critical juncture, shaped by technological evolution, regulatory pressure, and judicial decisions. In 2024–2025, court rulings, law enforcement actions, and technical adjustments are redefining the boundaries of this sector. Key developments include debates over whether decentralized mixing tools constitute sanctionable property, cross-border crackdowns on anonymous transaction services in Europe and the U.S., and privacy-focused projects adopting more compliant technical designs. Judicially, U.S. courts have issued influential rulings questioning whether immutable smart contracts fit traditional legal frameworks. Meanwhile, European authorities continue to target mixing services accused of facilitating money laundering. Technologically, some privacy projects are incorporating optional privacy features, flexible fee mechanisms, and improved audit interfaces to enhance usability and reduce regulatory friction. Macro-trends show countries advancing comprehensive crypto regulatory frameworks covering custody, trading, stablecoins, and anti-money laundering (AML) standards. Regulatory bodies increasingly demand that high-privacy tools provide verifiable audit trails or compliance-friendly modes to access legal financial services. Looking ahead, three main trajectories are emerging: continued legal clarification around smart contracts and mixer liabilities, a shift in privacy protocols from absolute anonymity toward optional privacy with auditability, and a market reassessment of the regulatory risk associated with privacy assets. This is causing a strategic split within the industry—some communities insist on strong privacy for niche demands, while others pursue “compliance-friendly privacy” models like enterprise-grade confidential transactions or auditable privacy pools. In essence, privacy coins are transitioning from pursuing maximum anonymity to seeking sustainable existence within regulatory boundaries. Future judicial rulings, policies, and protocol upgrades will determine which projects survive market and legal pressures. Those offering meaningful privacy while maintaining legal compliance are most likely to endure.

cointelegraph_中文11 мин. назад

The New Frontier of Privacy Coins: Technology, Prevention, and Regulatory Game

cointelegraph_中文11 мин. назад

Champion! Huobi HTX Tops the Industry with $583.7M Net Asset Inflow Over the Past 30 Days

In the competitive crypto industry, fund flows reveal true user trust. According to Defillama data on December 5, Huobi HTX recorded a net inflow of $583.7M over the past 30 days, ranking first among all centralized exchanges (CEXs). This reflects growing user confidence in the platform’s security, transparency, and product offerings. Huobi HTX has maintained steady growth in total assets and spot trading volume, forming a positive cycle of asset safety, user growth, and capital inflow. Key factors behind this performance include enhanced asset proof mechanisms—with 38 consecutive months of published Merkle Tree Proof of Reserves (PoR) and 100%+ reserve ratios for major assets—alongside improved C2C trading features such as a "100% compensation" policy and a streamlined user experience. The platform’s earn products, including Huobi Earn, also saw significant growth, with increases in both user participation and asset deposits for tokens like USDD, ETH, and TRX. Users are increasingly choosing Huobi HTX for its reliable yields, ease of use, and strong security measures during market volatility. As a long-established exchange founded in 2013, Huobi HTX has strengthened its compliance and risk management frameworks, reinforcing its reputation for safety and transparency. The net inflow milestone underscores its position as a trusted platform where users choose to securely store and grow their digital assets.

深潮33 мин. назад

Champion! Huobi HTX Tops the Industry with $583.7M Net Asset Inflow Over the Past 30 Days

深潮33 мин. назад

From 'Stablecoin First Stock' to 'Ankle Cut' in Stock Price: Why Circle Quickly Fell from the Spotlight into a Revaluation Cycle

From "Stablecoin Unicorn" to "Ankle-Cut" Stock Price: Why Circle Quickly Fell from Its Peak into a Revaluation Cycle Circle, the issuer of the USDC stablecoin, experienced a dramatic stock price decline shortly after its IPO in June, dropping from an initial peak of around $260 to approximately $88. This reflects a broader market shift from hype-driven optimism to a more rational reassessment of the stablecoin industry. Multiple factors contributed to this sharp correction. Initially, the stock was significantly overvalued due to market enthusiasm for the "first stablecoin stock" and the high-interest environment that boosted the appeal of its reserve-backed revenue model. As early investors took profits and sentiment cooled, a price correction was inevitable. Increased competition is also pressuring Circle. While USDC is the world's second-largest dollar stablecoin, it faces growing challenges from new stablecoin projects and digital dollar initiatives from traditional financial institutions. The sector is shifting from an oligopoly to intense competition, raising investor concerns about USDC's future growth certainty. Furthermore, macroeconomic interest rate trends pose a fundamental risk to Circle's business model. Its core revenue comes from interest earned on the cash and short-term U.S. Treasuries backing USDC. Expectations that the Federal Reserve may begin a rate-cutting cycle could directly compress this income. Rising operational and distribution costs further squeeze profitability. Analysts hold divergent views on Circle's future. Firms like Mizuho have turned bullish, upgrading the stock and suggesting the sell-off related to its post-IPO lockup expiration may have created a buying opportunity. They point to USDC's continued adoption by mainstream financial institutions. Conversely, analysts at firms like Susquehanna remain pessimistic, maintaining an "Underperform" rating. They warn that lower future interest rates and potential underperformance in USDC growth could continue to pressure the stock price and have lowered their price target. The upcoming end of the post-IPO lockup period, which restricts insiders from selling shares, has added near-term selling pressure, but this is viewed by some as a temporary overhang. Circle's recent Q3 earnings report, which beat expectations for both revenue and profit, shows that these fundamental concerns have not yet materialized, leaving the company's trajectory highly dependent on future interest rates and its ability to maintain and grow USDC's market share amidst fierce competition.

cointelegraph_中文34 мин. назад

From 'Stablecoin First Stock' to 'Ankle Cut' in Stock Price: Why Circle Quickly Fell from the Spotlight into a Revaluation Cycle

cointelegraph_中文34 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片